(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.10.30 2015고정2657

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.10.30 2015고정2657

상해

Text

Defendant

In respect of B, a sentence of punishment shall be suspended.

Defendant

A The prosecution against A is dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B around 19:50 on April 9, 2015, on the bus (D) parked at the bus bus stop located in the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City Smambro-dong, for the reason that the victim was bread, on the ground that the victim was bread, and that the victim was bread, and that the victim was bread, and that the victim was bread, and the head was bread, and the victim was breadd, by hand, the victim was bread, and the victim was bread, and the victim was bread, by hand, the victim was bread, and the victim’s face was bread with about 3 weeks of treatment, and the victim was bread with the bread part of other unfludyed part of the body part of the body part of the body part of the body part of

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a police suspect interrogation protocol to A;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. A fine not exceeding 700,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. The portion of dismissing public prosecution pursuant to Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (that there is no criminal record of the same kind to the defendant, that there was a mutual agreement at the latest following the two violent incidents, and the reasons for the instant case, etc.);

1. The summary of the facts charged was the victim’s assault against the victim’s B (n, 27 years old) at the time and place stated in the above facts of the crime, and the victim’s head was assaulted by breaking the victim’s head debt.

2. The case is a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, the victim can be found to have withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant after the prosecution of this case.

Therefore, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.

참조조문

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 김천지원 2014.4.10. 선고 2013고단1865 판결

-대구지방법원 김천지원 2014.04.10 2013고단1865

-부산지방법원 2014.01.23 2013고단6434

-대구지방법원 2019.01.23 2018고단4957

-서울남부지방법원 2019.02.12 2018고단4361