The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (three million won of a fine) is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. Although the nature of the crime in this case is not good in light of the content of the crime in this case committed in collusion with the owner of a commercial sex business establishment and the method of committing the crime in collusion with the owner of the commercial sex business, considering the fact that the defendant confessions the crime in this case on the other hand, there is no record of punishment for the same crime prior to the crime in this case, and other various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments, such as the defendant's age, happiness, family environment, and circumstances before and after the crime in this case, the sentence against the defendant is too uneasable.

3. If so, the prosecutor's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

However, since it is apparent that "1. confiscation" under the law of the court below is omitted by mistake in the former part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, etc., such addition is made ex officio in accordance with Article 25 (1) of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure.

.