A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 20, 2016, the Defendant: (a) had a friendly victim E in front of Jindo-gun C on October 20, 2016; (b) had a horse dispute with the victim E in front of Jindo-gun D; and (c) had the victim’s head with a brick, which is a dangerous object at the same time, and had the victim’s head, and had the victim’s head with a string of the head in the number of days of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is a dangerous object, and the crime of this case was committed in light of the type of dangerous object used by the defendant and the part of damage, etc., and the nature of the crime is not good in light of the following: (a) the type of dangerous object used by the defendant and the part of damage.

Although the defendant should be punished strictly, the suspension of execution shall be imposed only once in consideration of the favorable circumstances for the defendant, such as that the defendant reflects the defendant, that the victim does not want the punishment against the defendant, and that the defendant has no record of punishment in excess of the fine.