logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.4.7.선고 2016노1813 판결
업무방해
Cases

2016No1813 Interference with business affairs

Defendant

A person shall be appointed.

Appellant

Prosecutor

Prosecutor

U.S.C. (A.S.) No. 500,000

Judgment of the lower court

Ulsan District Court Decision 2016Ma2396 Decided October 14, 2016

Imposition of Judgment

April 7, 2017

Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of prosecutor's grounds for appeal;

The punishment sentenced by the court below (the fine of five million won) is too uneased and unfair.

2. Determination:

The fact that the defendant has been punished several times for violent crimes, and that he committed the crime of this case even though he was under suspension of execution due to the obstruction of performance of official duties, and that he did not reach an agreement with the victim is disadvantageous to the defendant.

However, there is a favorable condition for the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant committed a crime and reflects the mistake in depth, and that it is difficult to view the degree of interference with business, which is the crime of this case, as the crime of this case, etc. In addition, comprehensively taking account of the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, and all of the sentencing conditions stated in the arguments of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below is deemed reasonable and appropriate, and it cannot be deemed that it is unreasonable to deem that

3. Conclusion

Therefore, the prosecutor's appeal is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition by deciding to exclude it in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Judges

The presiding judge shall move-type judge.

Judges Kim Jong-soo

Justices Kim Jong-soo

arrow