1. The defendant's points out of the real estate stated in the separate sheet to the plaintiff are as follows: ①, ②, ③, ④, and ①.

1. Basic facts

가. 원고는 피고와 사이에 2011. 11. 9., 원고가 한국철도공사로부터 사용승인을 받아 영업장을 설치한 서울시 금천구 B 소재 도시전철 1호선 C역 구내 스낵 매장 11.3㎡(별지 도면 표시 ①, ②, ③, ④, ① 부분, 이하 ‘이 사건 매장’이라 한다)에 관하여 피고가 원고가 정한 업종을 원고의 영업시스템과 영업규칙에 따라 판매관리하고, 원고가 피고의 영업활동을 관리감독하기로 하는 내용의 전문점 운영계약을 체결하고, 위 계약을 매년 갱신하여 오다가 2014. 1. 1. 계약기간을 2014. 1. 1.부터 최대운영기간 종료예정일인 2014. 11. 30.까지로 연장하기로 하는 내용으로 위 계약(이하 ‘이 사건 전문점 운영계약’이라 한다)을 갱신하였으며, 이에 따라 피고가 이 사건 매장에서 ‘D’라는 상호로 스낵점을 운영하고 있다.

B. On January 1, 2014, the Defendant submitted a performance test to the Plaintiff that “The maximum operating period of the instant store is November 30, 2014, and thus, the Plaintiff would return the instant store to the Plaintiff’s Gyeonggi Headquarters upon the expiration of the contract term.”

C. After that, on September 18, 2014, the Plaintiff demanded that the Defendant transfer the instant store to a third party by transferring the store until December 3, 2014, since the maximum operating period of the instant specialty store contract expires on November 30, 2014, and thus, the Plaintiff requested that the Defendant transfer the store of this case by December 3, 2014. However, the Defendant refused to comply therewith and refused to transfer the store of this case until now.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 through 10 (including additional number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above fact of recognition as to the Plaintiff’s claim, since the instant contract for the operation of the specialty store was terminated on November 30, 2014, the Defendant shall deliver the instant store to the Plaintiff, barring any special circumstance.