logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.02.20 2013고정2888
근로기준법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, as the D representative in Speaker C, is an employer who ordinarily employs three workers and operates a manufacturing business.

The Defendant did not pay 1,428,00 won in total, including 315,00 won in January 2, 2013 and 1,113,000 won in February 2013, to E, who worked from January 17, 2013 to February 28, 2013 at the same place of business, within 14 days from the date of retirement, which is the date on which the cause for the payment occurred, without any agreement between the parties on the extension of the payment period.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Articles 109(1) and 36 of the Labor Standards Act that cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s explicit intent under Article 109(2) of the same Act. According to the records, it is apparent that the victim withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant on February 7, 2014, after the public prosecution of the instant case was instituted. Thus, the public prosecution of the instant case is dismissed under Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow