The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The Defendant, around January 8, 2015, obtained a loan of KRW 19,50,000 from C in order to raise funds for the purchase of a DNA car, which is a high-speed vehicle in the 2012-type Seoul Gangnam-gu Office (Seoul) around January 8, 2015, and agreed to pay the loan and its interest in installments for 36 months.

In addition, on January 8, 2015, the Defendant created a mortgage on KRW 19,500,000 on the said vehicle as a security for the obligation to pay the principal and interest of the above loan by the name of the Defendant.

From February 3, 2015 to November 17, 2015, the Defendant paid 1,341,0850,000 won, including principal, interest, etc., to C (the State) and did not pay the loan balance of 18,864,376 won and interest thereon, and the Defendant provided the said vehicle as security to the person who acquired the said claim from C (the State) with a view to borrowing KRW 5,00,000,000 from a place where it is impossible to identify the location of the said vehicle at around February 3, 2017.

Accordingly, the defendant concealed his own property which is the object of the victim's right, thereby hindering the victim's exercise of right.

2. The Defendant and the defense counsel asserted that the Defendant purchased the instant vehicle for the purpose of use by F, who was his spouse, and F, used the instant vehicle as indicated in the facts charged (hereinafter referred to as “instant vehicle”), and subsequently was divorced from the Defendant, but continued to use the instant vehicle, and the Defendant requested F, after undergoing the instant police investigation, to return the instant vehicle to F and notified F, that the Defendant would recover the instant vehicle, and did not borrow money as indicated in the facts charged, and did not provide the instant vehicle as security.

3. There is no room for a judge to be convicted in a judgment of conviction.