logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2019. 05. 30. 선고 2019다219076 판결
(심리불속행)사해행위 여부[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2018-Na2069135 ( October 12, 2019)

Case Number of the previous trial

Seoul Northern District Court-2017-Annex-23213 ( November 08, 2018)

Title

(Indecent Conduct) Whether a fraudulent act was committed

Summary

(Summary) The real estate sales contract between the delinquent taxpayer and the defendant constitutes a fraudulent act, and the delinquent taxpayer is aware that such an act constitutes a fraudulent act, and the delinquent taxpayer's good faith cannot be recognized as a beneficiary.

The argument on the grounds of appeal by appellant is that it does not include the grounds prescribed in the subparagraphs of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Procedure of Appeal or is groundless

Related statutes

Article 30 of the National Tax Collection Act

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Examining the lower judgment and the grounds of appeal, the grounds of appeal by appellant are not included in the grounds of appeal under each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, or are deemed to fall under each subparagraph of paragraph (3). Therefore, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per

arrow