logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.12.01 2016가단501091
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The plaintiff is a company established for the purpose of manufacturing steel structure.

B is a person who engages in trade business, etc. in the trade name of “C”, and is between the Defendant and the penalty.

The plaintiff, on March 24, 2014, to B, and B, on the same year

8. up to 31. up to 31. A letter of order for purchase was issued to the non-corporate non-corporate non-corporate non-corporate non-corporate non-corporate non-corporate non-corporate non-corporate group to supply the burners made of 03X12H10MPY to KRW 1,727,272,727 (excluding value-added tax).

The Plaintiff’s order, etc. to B on March 24, 2014, KRW 654 million, according to the order, etc.,

5.15.5 million won;

7.1.4 billion won;

7.4.150 million won;

7. 8.5 million won was remitted, and the sum of KRW 1,508,99,999 was paid by way of delivering a bill of exchange causing KRW 200 million (hereinafter “prepaid amount”).

B returned 200 million won out of the instant prepaid payment to the Plaintiff on August 23, 2014.

The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against B on the claim for refund of advance payment under this Court 2014Gahap70132.

On September 24, 2015, the above court rendered a favorable judgment against the Plaintiff that “B shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 1,308,99,999 (= KRW 1,508,99,999-200 million) and damages for delay.”

The Plaintiff filed a complaint against B as a crime of fraud and occupational embezzlement, and during the investigation process, B deposited KRW 50 million out of the instant prepaid payment into the Defendant’s account on August 23, 2014.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, summary of the plaintiff's argument as to the purport of the whole argument: The defendant's participation in the acquisition or embezzlement of the prepaid money of this case by the defendant. Thus, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for damages of KRW 50 million.

2. Claim 2: A claim for return of a loan based on a creditor's subrogation right (the first preliminary claim) is a claim for a loan of at least KRW 50 million to the defendant.

The defendant is obligated to pay KRW 50 million to the plaintiff who subrogated to the insolvent B.

3. Claim: Right of Revocation.

arrow