logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원평택지원 2016.12.20 2016가단43778
보증금반환
Text

1. The Defendants shall jointly and severally serve as KRW 143,140,000 on the Plaintiff and as a result, from June 9, 2015 to September 18, 2016.

Reasons

1. The following facts can be acknowledged in light of (i) the judgment as to the cause of the claim, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7, and the purport of the entire pleadings.

① 피고 주식회사 B(이하 ‘B’라고 한다)는 2012. 3.경 소외 E와 평택시 F 외 2필지 및 그 지상건물에 대하여 보증금 5억 원, 월차임 2,640만 원으로 된 임대차계약을 체결한 후 2013. 1. 29.경 원고와 위 임대목적물의 일부인 '평택시 F 외 2필지 C동 103호∽105호 이하 '이 사건 건물'이라고 한다

The sub-lease contract was concluded with a deposit of KRW 100 million, monthly rent of KRW 4 million, and thereafter, on July 15, 2014, the 'the sub-lease contract of KRW 250 million, monthly rent of KRW 00,000,000 and KRW 0,000 is called the 'the sub-lease contract of this case'.

(2) According to the instant sub-lease contract, the Plaintiff paid KRW 180 million out of the deposit amount of KRW 250 million to Defendant B until August 15, 2014 (i.e., KRW 180,134,162, but the Plaintiff and Defendant B paid KRW 180,000,000 after each other). (iii) On the other hand, the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking the name of the overdue rent of KRW 220,133,316 against Defendant B around June 27, 2014, around KRW 20,000, KRW 180,000, KRW 300,000, KRW 300,000, KRW 300,000, KRW 160,000, KRW 300,000, KRW 608,000, KRW 306,000, KRW 168,000.

⑤ Defendant C and D are the actual operator of Defendant B, and they are the obligation to refund the deposit to the Plaintiff.

arrow