1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of litigation are assessed against the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a company established for the purpose of manufacturing and wholesale business of the heat line for the prevention of the same wave.

The heat line for the prevention of the same wave is the heat of the self-control resistance which is designed to control the internal resistance by itself according to the changes in the surrounding temperature and automatically increase the heat of the heat by continuously controlling the inner resistance according to the rapid change in the temperature.

B. Around 2012, the Plaintiff purchased a heat line for the dynamic wave prevention (hereinafter “instant heat line”) produced by the Defendant, and installed it on the first floor material storage among the ground buildings owned by the Plaintiff, Chuncheon C (hereinafter “instant building”).

On January 5, 2018, a fire occurred in a material warehouse of the first floor underground among the instant buildings.

(hereinafter “instant fire”). C.

According to the investigation report on the fire of this case as a result of the investigation of the fire of this case, the fire of this case is presumed to be "the point of the fire of this case shall be presumed to be the point where the heat line A (the heat line of this case) installed in the water-supply pipe inside the center of the center of the underground 1st floor, where the heat line A (the heat line of this case) installed in the water-supply pipe inside the water-supply pipe, and the cause shall be presumed to be a fire that is carried out by the heat or heat from the heat line (the heat line of this case) installed for the purpose of preventing the dynamics in the water-supply pipe (the heat line of this case), which is turned from the water-supply pipe to the water-supply pipe located in the right-hand building site, and

The Gangwon Provincial Police Agency concluded that the fire in this case was planted, and that the cause of the fire was “the possibility that the possibility of the outbreak by human intervention would have been generated by the electrical heat, flames, etc. that occurred in the process of forming an excessive heat or a sacrificing of the static cable (the end of the instant heat line).”

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 3, 4, and the purport of the whole pleadings.