1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff, which orders payment below, shall be revoked.

The defendant.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded a lease agreement with H on the commercial building in Daejeon-gu I (hereinafter “instant commercial building”), and operated a store in the said commercial building.

B. On July 10, 2014, around 22:48, a fire that occurred in the store operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “instant store”) among the instant commercial buildings, destroyed the entire commercial building and the household effects owned by the Plaintiff.

(hereinafter “instant fire”). C.

The main contents of the appraisal report prepared by the National Institute of Scientific Investigation on August 1, 2014 with respect to the fire of this case are images that have been burned around the J main point of the commercial building among CCTV images for crime prevention in the investigation data, and there is no special nature of burning in the store of the commercial building. It is possible to limit the area around the J main point to the shotning point, and the commercial building can be excluded from the shoting point of view. The surrounding area of the J main point of the shotning installation is the shotning of the shotle and electric power source from the power line of the reticulator, which is hard to be formed in the process of the formation of the shotle in the process of the shotning of the shotle and electric power source. Considering the fact that the shots from the electric wires of the main point of view and the surrounding connection point of the electric wires, it is presumed that the outer shotle of the shotle formation of the shotle and the outer shotle.