A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

[2017 Highest 552]

1. On September 28, 2016, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol at around 00:00 on September 28, 2016, driven a C-A4 car at the section of approximately 100 meters from the front of the tactical warehouse located in the Yansan-gun of the Chungcheongnambuk-gun to the front of the Paris store located in the same Ri, while the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol at around 00:00 on September 28, 2016.

2. On April 3, 2017, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol around 23:40 on Apr. 3, 2017, driven a cub car in D in the section of approximately 500 meters from the 119th day before the 119 Safety Center in the large rith of the Hashean Island, at the 0.084% alcohol level from blood transfusion.

[2017 Highest 755]

3. On June 27, 2017, the Defendant driving a driver’s license without a driver’s license on June 27, 2017, driving a E-A-D car without a driver’s license within approximately 5km from the front of the market in the vicinity of Pyeongtaek-si A-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa

Summary of Evidence

[2017 Highest 552]

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Each police statement concerning G and F;

1. A written statement;

1. A report on occurrence of a violation of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Notification of the results of regulating driving of alcohol;

1. Statement on the circumstances of the driver at each driving school;

1. A copy of the ledger using the measuring instruments for drinking;

1. The ledger of driver's licenses for each motor vehicle and the register of each motor vehicle;

1. CCTV video CDs, etc.;

1. Inspection of the register of vehicles and the register of motor vehicles;

1. Each investigation report (report on telephone conversations by a witness H, a statement on the damaged circumstances, and a report on telephone conversations by a police officer dispatched) (the criminal facts committed by the defendant);

1. As noted, although around 00:00 on September 28, 2016, a person who drives the instant vehicle at the same time and at the same time did not know the name of the person who drives the instant vehicle. The person asserts that the person who drives the instant vehicle at the same time and time is an acting driver whose name cannot be known.

According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court, especially the witness F's legal statement, etc.