logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.10.04 2018고단2419
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On December 30, 201, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of a fine of three million won for a crime of violating road traffic laws at the Seoul Eastern District Court on December 30, 201, and on April 25, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for six months for a crime of violating road traffic laws at the Seoul Eastern District Court.

[2018 Highest 2419] On July 13, 2018, the Defendant driven D A4 vehicle from the front of Yongsan-gu Seoul to the front of Yongsan-gu to the same Gu C, while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.118% during blood around 08:25 on July 13, 2018.

As a result, the Defendant, who violated the prohibition on drinking at least twice, was driven under the influence of alcohol again.

[2018 Highest 2617]

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle with DAD, in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Risk Driving).

On July 7, 2018, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.192% in blood around 05:30 on July 7, 2018, and led the road of Yongsan-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City E-do to the direction of F first intersection in the direction of the Leewon Fire Station.

At the time, there are other vehicles at night and in the front door, so in such a case, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle shall not drive a motor vehicle in a state where normal driving is difficult due to influence of drinking, and has the duty of care to prevent the accident in advance by safely examining the front side.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded in the same direction while under the influence of alcohol without being able to live well, and the part of the Defendant’s H (30) drive of the victim G(30 Do) following the Haststa patrol vehicle in the same direction conflict with the upper part of the upper part of the passenger car above.

As a result, the Defendant was unable to drive normally due to the influence of drinking, and the Defendant was negligent in performing the above duties, for about two weeks to the victim I (29 years old) who was the victim G and the patrol driver.

arrow