logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2019.07.09 2019고단294
보조금관리에관한법률위반등
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative of the “E” in Changwon-si Mucompo-gu D, and Defendant B is the actual operator of the F building in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, the F building in Changwon-si, and Defendant C (State) in the head of the Gu.

The Gyeongnam-do established the H "H" to contribute to the increase of income through prompt treatment and storage of fishery products and securing the safety of exported products, and to revitalize the regional economy through the modernization of public processing facilities, with regard to the 14 places of business in Changwon-si, Changcheon-si, Si, Si, Si, Gu, Si, Do, Do, Gun, and Gun, etc., and the project cost was to be raised at the ratio of 30% of the national project cost, 9% of the local project cost, 21% of the Si, Gun, and 40% of the national project cost.

Changwon-si promoted I as part of the instant project plan (hereinafter referred to as “instant subsidized project”). Defendant A was selected as a subsidized project operator of the instant subsidized project on September 18, 2012.

1. Defendants A and B shall not receive subsidies by false application or by other unlawful means;

Defendant

A had already had the intent or ability to pay the self-paid cost, such as the amount of debt equivalent to KRW 1 billion, but rather had the intention or ability to pay the subsidy, and proposed that “the Defendant B was unable to prepare the self-paid cost for the government subsidy project” at the early October 2012 office of the first police officer (hereinafter referred to as “the first police officer”) to construct the factory at the minimum cost and make the details of false self-paid expenses,” and Defendant B consented thereto. On October 15, 2012, the Defendant C and the actual owner agreed to obtain approximately KRW 540 million from October 22, 2012 to December 31, 2012 to build the processing factory 1 (408С), one Dong (408С), one building (1st,58С, 2231 stories and 50 billion stories) and one building (25 billion won) and enter the contract with the Defendant’s office by deceptioning the construction cost by means of fraudulent means.

The Defendants shared the Defendant A’s own shares.

arrow