The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary G and F of the grounds for appeal do not have any reason to make consistent and false statements from the investigative agency to the court of original trial. However, although I made a statement at the investigative agency for the same purpose as above two persons, it appears that I received the request from the defendant's side in the court of original trial or made a false statement because it did not coincide with G, so I's legal statement at the court of original instance is difficult to believe, and J's legal statement at the court of original instance is also difficult to believe, and according to J's statement at the court of original instance, it is difficult to believe, G and F's statement

Nevertheless, the court below ruled the defendant not guilty, and there is an error of law by misunderstanding the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Determination

A. The lower court’s judgment: (a) the Defendant, from the first investigative agency to the instant court, inspected the identification card of four persons including the above F (F, G, H, and I) in the instant singing book; (b) the Defendant had provided guidance to the instant singing book; and (c) the Defendant consistently asserted to the effect that there was no juvenile as a result of the inspection; and (b) the Defendant had been on duty in the instant singing book.

J in this Court, at the time of the occurrence of the instant case, met with two persons (H, I) during the instant case, and the said two persons at the time of the Defendant’s failure to inspect the identification card.

There was a reply to the purport that the above two persons were “comfort”.

It is known from G that the above I appeared in this court and the defendant inspected his identification cards and inspected F and G identification cards when the defendant appeared in this court, and the above I inspected F and G identification cards.

G은 이 사건 발생 후 ‘F 가 남의 신분증을 빌려서 피고인에게 제시하였고, 이후 위 신분증을 자신 (G) 의 신발 밑에 숨겨 놨으니, 신분증 검사를 안 받았다고

I made a statement to the effect that the statement was requested by “the statement,” and I made the Defendant as the friendship of G and F.