logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2014.07.18 2014고정110
청소년보호법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who operates a general restaurant in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C.

No person shall sell, lend, or distribute drugs harmful to juveniles, etc. against juveniles.

Nevertheless, around 01:01 on October 30, 2013, the Defendant sold to three, not less than 17 years of age, the juvenile E (17 years of age) one disease and two disease and two disease and so forth, which are drugs harmful to juveniles, in total 25,700 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness F, G, H and I;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing drinking pictures;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, and Articles 59 subparagraph 6 and 28 (1) of the Juvenile Protection Act which choose a penalty;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant's assertion of Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment is asserted to the effect that the defendant requested his/her father, a juvenile, to present his/her identification card to E and three other children, and confirmed his/her birth for 92 years.

Therefore, the lives stand and the witness G (K) demanded by J to show the resident registration certificates of his male-friendly arrest F (95 years old).

It is well aware of whether it has obtained or demanded an identification card, but it stated to the effect that the F's resident registration certificate, which was located in the land A reported by himself and F, was cited by J, and the witness F stated that he did not examine the identification card even before J requested the identification card, and the witness H (L) stated that he did not examine the identification card, but he did not examine the identification card any defect. The witness I heard the statement from J to the effect that he confirmed the above juvenile as a 92-year student by conducting an identification card examination against the above juvenile, and in particular, it was searched the body in a way that the body of the juvenile designated by J as a 92-year student, but was forged.

arrow