logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2018. 03. 29. 선고 2017두75200 판결
(심리불속행) 이 사건 토지가 8년 자경에 해당하는 지 여부[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2017-Nu64219 ( December 01, 2017)

Title

(D) Whether the land of this case constitutes a self-defense of eight years or more

Summary

(C) Although the land of this case was partially cultivated on the land of this case as claimed by the Plaintiff, it is difficult to deem that the land of this case was cultivated by the Plaintiff’s own labor by more than half of the farming work.

Related statutes

Article 69 of the Restriction of Special Taxation Act (Abatement or Exemption of Transfer Income Tax for Self-Cultivating Farmland)

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined. However, the grounds of appeal on the grounds of appeal are not included in the grounds stipulated in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the Act. It is so decided as per Disposition

arrow