1. On September 2, 2014, the Defendant made the Plaintiff the reason for the termination of the entrustment contract with respect to the motor vehicles indicated in the attached list.

1. Basic facts

A. On April 3, 2009, the Plaintiff entered into an entrustment contract (hereinafter “instant contract”) with the Defendant on the following terms: (a) registered the name of the automobile owner in the attached list, which is one’s own (hereinafter “instant automobile”); and (b) registered the instant automobile operation and management right from the Defendant to operate the instant automobile; and (c) entered into an entrustment contract with the Defendant to pay the fare, etc. to the Defendant.

B. The Plaintiff expressed his/her intent to terminate the instant contract through the instant complaint, and on September 2, 2014, the said declaration of intent reached the Defendant.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, significant facts in this court, Gap 1 and Eul 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. The instant contract, which is a truck entry contract for judgment on the cause of the claim, is a form of contract which combines the elements of the title trust and the delegation, and is in the position of the delegating and the Plaintiff in the position of the title truster, at any time, to terminate the contract and to recover the ownership of the motor vehicle (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 97Da29479, Nov. 11, 197). As long as the content certification indicating the intent to terminate the contract was served on the Defendant, the Defendant is liable to implement the procedure for ownership transfer registration on the instant motor vehicle

B. The defendant's argument 1) The defendant's argument summary is part of the defendant's transportation business right corresponding to KRW 20 million, and the plaintiff acquires the above transportation business right and the defendant loses it. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case which is unilaterally unfavorable to the defendant is unfair. 2) The registration number and its registration number and its registration number are not vested property belonging to the defendant, nor can it be transferred to others according to the defendant's intention.