The Defendants are exempt from the punishment regarding the 2013 Highest 3183. The facts charged against the Defendants are as follows: 2013 Highest 2654.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] Defendant A was sentenced to three years of imprisonment by the Suwon District Court on May 23, 2012, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on March 14, 2013, and on April 10, 2013, Defendant A was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for violating the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act by the Seoul Southern District Court on April 10, 2013 and the said judgment became final and conclusive on September 24, 2013.

Defendant

B On September 13, 2013, the Seoul Southern District Court sentenced one year and six months of imprisonment for violating the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act, etc., and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 12, 2013.

Defendant

C On April 10, 2013, the Seoul Southern District Court sentenced two years and three months to the violation of the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act by violating the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act. On December 12, 2013, the above judgment became final and conclusive.

【Criminal Facts】

Defendant A, B, and H of 2013 [2013 Highest 3183] are those who actually work together with a limited liability company, the export company of vehicles, and Defendant C are those who take charge of export practice, such as the entry and exit of export vehicles of the said company.

The Defendants restricted the overseas export of vehicles at the domestic vehicle manufacturer company after the release of the vehicle from the vehicle, and the fact was that Defendant A and Defendant B, limited liability companies, established or acquired a siren company, to disguised the purchase of a new vehicle for the purpose of export, thereby creating a disguised corporation, and then purchased a new vehicle from the domestic vehicle manufacturer company in the name of the said siren company, and then the limited liability company I conspired with the H to receive a false tax invoice from the said siren company.

1. In collusion with H on June 25, 2010, the Defendants filed a value-added tax return on a limited liability company I on or around June 25, 2010. The fact is a tax invoice of KRW 58,396,363, supply value from the case of a limited liability company, even though the Defendants did not receive any goods or services from the case of a limited liability company.