beta
Text
Defendant
A and B shall be punished by imprisonment for three months, by imprisonment for four months, respectively.
Reasons
Criminal facts
【Defendant A was sentenced to one year to six months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Southern District Court on February 5, 2013, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on February 13, 2013. On July 5, 2013, the Incheon District Court sentenced two years of suspension of execution to eight months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. on July 13, 2013, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on July 12, 2014. On June 12, 2014, the Seoul Southern District Court sentenced one year and six months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Southern District Court, and on May 22, 2015, the said judgment became final and conclusive on May 30, 2015, by being sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Southern District Court.
Defendant
B On May 2, 2015, the Seoul Southern District Court sentenced one year and eight months of imprisonment for fraud, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on the 26th of the same month.
Defendant
C was sentenced to five years of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Eastern District Court on February 6, 2015, and the judgment was finalized on May 29, 2015, and on July 9, 2015, the Seoul East Eastern District Court sentenced three months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. and two years of imprisonment for the said judgment was finalized on September 11, 2015.
Defendant
D On May 2, 2015, the Seoul Southern District Court sentenced 4 years and ten months to imprisonment for fraud, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 15, 2015.
【Criminal Facts of Crimes】 around April 2012, the Defendants conspired to acquire money by forging the lease contract on H apartment 207 Do 1801 in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seoul, which is G ownership, by providing it as a collateral and obtaining a loan. Defendant A agreed to take charge of the role of house owner G, Defendant D’s act of forging documents and arranging the lending business entity, Defendant B’s act of tenant, and Defendant C’s act of planning and forging documents for the crime of the said fraudulent loan.
1. Forgery of private documents;
A. The Defendants are invited to forge the lease contract under the name of G for the purpose of using it for the above crime, and accordingly, Defendant D is in the trade name in the Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Burial site around May 2012.