logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.07.14 2017나6404
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff, which orders payment below, shall be revoked.

The defendant.

Reasons

1. The quoted trial of the first instance court was examined closely by the parties’ allegations and the evidence presented at the first instance court and the first instance court. However, it does not seem that there was any error in the fact-finding and judgment of the first instance court.

Therefore, the reason for the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the part of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows. Therefore, it is accepted by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The phrase "statement of calculation of the amount of damages" in Part VI of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be replaced by that of the six pages of the judgment.

From 3th to 4th 10th 1th 1th 10th 10th 10th 206.

“A) In full view of the overall purport of the pleadings as a result of physical examination of the evidence Nos. 4 and 5 No. 4 and the Mayor of the First Instance of the National University of Seoul Synsung Hospital, the Plaintiff may be found to have permanently lost the ability to work for 32% by applying the occupational coefficient 5 in the occupational coefficient of the 12 chest-C (Synificule where the 1/5 or 2 cycles are not accompanied by the number of damage) among the spinal damage in the Mabrid disability Assessment Table. As such, the Plaintiff may be deemed to have permanently lost the ability to work for 32% by applying the occupational coefficient 5 in the Mac(Synificule part) of the Mabrid disability Assessment Table.

In this regard, the defendant asserts that since the plaintiff was subject to spin fixed and fluids, paragraph 5 (e.g., E., E., E-D-2 (C. E. E. E. E. E. E. E.D-2-b) of the above disability assessment table should be applied. However, the above V-D-2-b can apply to the plaintiff who suffered from the injury of the E.g. E. E. E. E. E. E. E. E. E. E. E.D-2-2 (b) merely caused the injury to E. E. E. E. E. E. E. E. E. E., E. E. E.

arrow