logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2015.05.14 2014고단1586
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around 01:20 on July 17, 2014, the Defendant assaulted the victim E head of the victim E by taking advantage of the victim E’s face and body part at 2-3 times in drinking, against the victim E, at 2-3 times in opposition to the victim E’s face and body part, and placing the victim E face part at 2-3 times in drinking, which is a dangerous object on the table of the table, and the beer’s disease is broken up, and the beer’s disease is broken up to the head of the victim E (a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective, deadly weapon, etc.) and the part is assaulted (a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective, deadly weapon, etc.) to fit the victim F (age 43 years of age) who was adjacent to the victim’s face and hand.

[Violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective action, a deadly weapon, etc.)]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the accused and E in the suspect examination protocol of the prosecution concerning E;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime concerned, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. The following facts are as follows: (a) the victim E who tried to commit an offence under Article 53 and Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation in depth; (b) the victim E is fully responsible for the occurrence of damage; (c) the victims and the victim’s health conditions were not good; (d) the pregnant Defendant’s spouse wanting to commit an offence, and (e) the Defendant’s spouse in pregnancy at the time of a repeated attack, and (e) the Defendant’s wife wanting to commit an offence, and (e) the Defendant’s spouse in pregnancy at the time of a repeated attack was broken to the victim F, the main agent of which is unrelated to the dispute, against the repeated attack, and (e) the degree of damage suffered by the said victim.

arrow