logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2013.04.19 2012고단2205
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등폭행)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the representative of the C Apartment tenant in 1,00, and the victim D (V, 56 years old) and the victim E (V, 50 years old) are the parties to the apartment sales agency.

1. On July 31, 2012, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collective assaulting with a deadly weapon, etc.) was assaulted in line with the victim’s head D by scaming the victim’s victim’s damage to the problem of parcelling-out from the victim E while talking about the problem of parcelling-out at the F restaurant at the net 20,000 square city.

2. Around 20:20 on July 31, 2012, the Defendant received a report in relation to paragraph 1 in front of the F cafeteria as stated in paragraph 1 and filed a report to a police officer, and filed a separate report, and assaulted the victim E on two occasions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E, D and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to on-site photographs ( CHAPTER VII);

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. of Specific Crimes, Articles 2 (1) and 2 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime (the point of violence and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act. Article 50 (Limits to Aggregate of Long-term Punishment of Two Crimes)

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. On the part of the Defendant’s assertion regarding probation and community service order Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, the Defendant asserts that the crime of the crime of the crime of paragraph (1) merely took a beer’s disease on the wall by a beer with no intention to commit assault, and that there was no fact that the victim’s E was sprinked by a beer’s beer or sponsed by a beer’s beerer’s beer’s beer’s beer’s beer’s beer’

According to each evidence of the judgment, the defendant is the defendant.

arrow