logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.01.25 2017고단8686
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of 10 months, Defendant B's imprisonment of 1 year, Defendant C's imprisonment of 8 months, Defendant D's fine of 1,00.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Although Defendant A was under the control of “G” business places, which are similar to the instant business places, on the fourth floor of the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F building (hereinafter “instant business establishment”), and was sentenced to suspended execution as above, Defendant A continued to operate the instant business establishment along with B, and the Defendant operated and managed the overall business of the instant business establishment, such as settlement of profits and payment of rent, etc. to the actual business place, and Party B, as “the head of the office,” shared and recruited each of the roles to take charge of customer reservation and management of female employees.

A. The Defendant in collusion with B, from January 2016 to March 2017, the instant business establishment constituted an act of arranging commercial sex acts, such as inducing and arranging commercial sex acts in collusion with B, by guiding unspecified men to guest rooms in the business establishment after receiving the price for commercial sex acts of KRW 80,000 to KRW 120,000,00, and by guiding them to the guest rooms in the business establishment, and by allowing them to take the lead, leading, taking the lead, receiving the string, taking the string, and using the string, and making them take the string, leading, leading the customer to the string, taking the string, using the string, and using the string, making the said D et al. al. al. al. to stimulate their sexual organ by suffering from their injuries and losses.

(b) No person who violates the Occupational Stabilization Act shall recruit workers with the intention to have them find a job in a job involving sexual traffic or other obscene acts;

Nevertheless, the Defendant conspired with B, from January 2016 to March 2017, recruited D, H, etc. with an intent to allow the Defendant to be employed in the business where the act of sexual intercourse and obscene act was committed in the same manner as above.

2. Defendant B conspired with A, as described in the foregoing paragraph 1, and even after having been on February 2016, Defendant B was in charge of the reservation of customers and the management of female employees, etc., and from March 2017, Defendant B had received the instant business establishment from A and had the intent to operate and manage the instant business establishment.

(a)..

arrow