logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.05.18 2018고단1007
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 5, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Seoul Western District Court on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Seoul Southern District Court on April 5, 2017.

1. On March 20, 2018, the Defendant interfering with his/her duties is a king of the Victim D’s “E” in the mutual restaurant in Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government around 17:30 on March 20, 2018, with the victim’s “E” without any particular reason. The Defendant is a king of the victim.

”, “ 짱 깨 새끼들은 다 죽어야 돼. ”라고 크게 소리를 지르고 식탁 위에 있던 그릇을 던지는 시늉을 하고 위 식당 종업원에게 다가가 의자를 들어 올리는 등으로 약 30 분간 위력으로 피해자의 식당 영업업무를 방해하였다.

2. On March 20, 2018, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, and around 18:00, the Defendant got the disturbance of the Defendant in the above “cafeteria”.

’ 는 112 신고를 받고 출동한 서대문 경찰서 F 파출소 소속 순경 G이 피고인에게 식당에서 퇴거할 것을 권유하자, 위 G에게 “ 놔 이 새끼야.”, “ 너 나 알지. 이 새끼야.” 라는 등 큰 소리로 욕설을 하면서 의자를 던지는 시늉을 하고 위 식당 테이블에 놓여 있던 피고인의 지갑과 수첩을 G의 얼굴을 향해 집어던져 G을 폭행하여 경찰관의 112 신고 처리 및 범죄 단속에 관한 정당한 직무집행을 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or G;

1. CDs (on-site videos);

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the current status of confinement by sentence and individual;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties) and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes;

1. Grounds for sentencing under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the same Act, as the punishment for concurrent crimes;

1. One type of crime (Interference with business) committed within the scope of the recommended sentence.

arrow