(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.01.16 2014고단9032

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.01.16 2014고단9032

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a driver of the Dunststa car owned by C.

On August 30, 2014, the Defendant driven the above car at a speed of about 40-50 km from the direction of the border reading center to the direction of this water zone according to the four-lanes between the four-lanes in front of 127 and the four-lanes in front of Seoul Seocho-gu, Seoul.

At the time, there was a crosswalk at which signal lights are installed at night, and in such a case, there was a duty of care to reduce the speed to those engaged in driving service and properly manipulate the steering gear and brake system to prevent accidents in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went back to the right side of the Defendant’s passenger car, and went back to the 4-lane of the same direction by neglecting her speed without neglecting her speed, and neglecting her on the front side and left side, and neglecting her driving on the 4-lane of the same direction as her driving by the victim E (the age of 52). The Defendant, following the left side of the Fststynael taxi and the back back to the 40-meter of the Defendant’s passenger car, had the victim G (the age of 33) facing the four-lanes and continued to go back.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, suffered injury to the victim G, including the closure 1st time in the year of need of approximately 8 weeks of treatment, and suffered injury to the victim E, such as satise, tensions, etc. requiring approximately 2 weeks of treatment, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as immediately stopping and checking the state of damage, even though the victim taxi departmented about 2,718,000 won of repair costs, such as exchange of a spread, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Statement of the police statement related H;

1. Each written statement of E and G;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Photographs;

1. Written estimate;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. The investigation report E and the victim G telephone statement;

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2015.10.07 2015고단4235

-서울중앙지방법원 2019.08.30 2019고단2848

-수원지방법원 2017.01.25 2016고단4625

-서울중앙지방법원 2020.03.25 2019고단8770

-서울남부지방법원 2013.04.24 2013고단825