Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and for four months, respectively.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant A.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A [A] is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle with the highest price in return for a motor vehicle E.

On April 13, 2016, the Defendant was driving the said car at F, F, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P

At the time, night was in a situation where a dog was spared, and there was a duty of care to safely drive a person engaged in driving service by reducing the speed and taking the left and right well.

Nevertheless, the defendant was negligent in driving his vehicle on the right side of the road by negligence.

G Hading a part following the left-hand side of the G-learning car is shocked with the above top right-hand part, and the victim H ( South, 36 years old), which was placed in his wife, was shocked to get on the above-learning car, was stopped to a degree of about 30 meters and stopped, followed by the above-mentioned high-speed car.

B was sent to the scene of the case where the victim was written by the victim, and himself remains in the vicinity of the above low-priced car, and his identity was concealed by avoiding himself by the police officer of the police station I police station of the Jinsung, who was in the vicinity of the police station, and the above B kept the victim's hospital back at the site of the case, and went back to the conversation with the police officer after completing the conversation with the victim.

After all, the Defendant, due to the above occupational negligence, suffered injury to the victim, such as mination of dulvers in the right flusium in need of treatment for about six weeks, but failed to immediately stop and rescue the victim, and to take necessary measures, such as identifying his identity, to the police officer dispatched.

2. Defendant B (a criminal is also an offender) was aware of the fact that the Defendant sustained injury by shocking the victim H due to occupational negligence while driving a high-priced motor vehicle in the front of the Franchisium around April 13, 2016. However, the above Defendant was aware of the fact that he/she sustained injury by shocking the victim H due to occupational negligence.