beta
Text
1. The defendant is based on the order of seizure and collection against the plaintiffs, which is established by the Goyang-gu District Court 2018TTT 32102.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On April 17, 2018, the Plaintiff Co., Ltd. received a seizure and collection order with respect to the goods-price claim amounting to KRW 150,801,369 from the Jungyang Branch of the Jung-gu District Court (2018TTTT 4093) on the title of execution of the notarial deed with executory power of No. 82 in 2018, 2018, the Plaintiff Co., Ltd. received a seizure and collection order with respect to the E’s goods-price claim amounting to KRW 150,801,369, and the said decision was served to H on May 9, 2018.
B. On April 26, 2018, Plaintiff B was issued a seizure and collection order with respect to the claim of KRW 55,638,614 (price for goods) against Ha, with the title of execution of each executory payment order in the Seoul Southern District Court loan 2017Hu179149, and the 2018Hu1063, 20163, with the title of execution of each executory payment order in the goods payment case, and the above order was served on Ha on May 27, 2018.
C. On March 13, 2018, the Defendant: (a) issued a seizure and collection order with respect to the goods-price claim amounting to KRW 105,622,294 from the Jung-gu District Court Goyang-gu District Court (2018TTT 32102) on the title of execution of the notarial deed with the executory power of No. 140, 2016 drafted by the JJ as the title; and (b) the said decision was served to H on March 14, 2018.
According to the above order of seizure and collection, the Defendant collected KRW 12,284.800 as of April 10, 2018, and KRW 12,507,330 as of May 10, 2018, respectively, from H, the garnishee, based on the order of seizure and collection, and did not report it to the above court.
E. Meanwhile, on November 13, 2018, the Defendant issued a seizure and collection order with respect to the goods-price claim amounting to KRW 625,363,756 from the Jung-gu District Court Goyang Branch (2018TTT 40984) on the part of a notary public of the Republic of Korea as the title of execution of the notarial deed with the executory power of No. 968, 2012, which was executed by the J. 2012, and the above decision was served to H around that time.
[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-1, 2-2, Gap evidence 2-1, 2-2, Gap evidence 4-1, 2, 5-2, 2, 3.