logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.08.29 2015가단5321240
구상금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. From April 11, 2015, the Defendant Company: (a) around April 11, 2015, the instant building (hereinafter “instant building”); (b) the steel structure prefabricated C ground-based sandmarking panel, one story store, and office office; (c)

2) Of the office parts (hereinafter “instant office”), the office parts

A) A person leased and used the instant building; Defendant B was the owner of the instant building; D is the part of the store of the instant building (hereinafter “instant store”).

(2) Around December 19, 2014, the Plaintiff concluded a property comprehensive insurance contract (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”) with the Korea Development Bank for the settlement of disputes, the Korea Development Bank Co., Ltd., and each member shop from December 19, 2014 to December 19, 2015. The subject matter of the insurance includes the facilities, fixtures, goods, etc. of the instant store.

B. (1) On April 11, 2015, around 14:50, a warehouse behind the instant office (hereinafter “instant warehouse”) is located.

In the instant case, the fire occurred (hereinafter “instant fire”).

(2) The instant building was divided into the instant office and the instant store. The instant building was divided into the instant office and the instant shop, and separate affiliated buildings were attached to the instant office, but the toilets used by D and the toilets used by the Defendant company were destroyed, and the storage of the instant building was replaced by the said laund. The location of the instant warehouse, which is the point of combustion of the instant fire, was the following parts: (a) the instant building was divided into the instant office and the instant shop; (b) the instant building was divided into the structure of the sand site panel on the first floor; and (c) there was a separate affiliated building adjacent to the instant office; (d) the toilets used by D and the toilets used by the Defendant company were destroyed by the said laund; and (c) the storage of the instant building was replaced by the said laund, but was separated from the instant laund.

3 The warehouse of this case is due to fire.

arrow