beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for a year and two months, respectively.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is the representative director of E Co., Ltd. for the purpose of water suspension, manufacturing and marketing, and Defendant B is the management director of the above company.
Defendant
On August 17, 2016, after receiving a loan of 400 million won for corporate facility funds from the Korean Bank of Korea, A created a security interest of 54,00,000,000 won in total at the market price of 554,00,000 won at the place of business of the said legal entity, JL-80, 4 Electronic Animal S-3 Packaging, JL-80BM S-3 Packaging, JL5020 Electronic Animals S-80, and JL-80M S-3 Packing-3 Packing-3 Packaging-S-S-3 Packing-S-S-S-S-S-S-3 Packing-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-
Accordingly, Defendant A had a duty to keep the above machinery in good faith and not extinguish the value of the security until he/she fully performs his/her secured obligation as a transferor security right holder.
Defendant
A, on August 2017, 2017, after establishing a new water dust manufacturing corporation in the name of F, an employee of E Co., Ltd., for the purpose of moving the said three machinery to the business in the name of the corporation, and ordered Defendant B to establish a corporation and move the machinery as above.
Defendant
B, around August 8, 2017, upon Defendant A’s instruction, established the legal entity of H, a corporation, the representative director of which is H, in G, with F as the representative director, and subsequently, around August 17, 2017, the three above machinery was transferred to the business establishment of the said legal entity and the ownership relationship was unclear, and the victim was concealed by hiding the location of the machinery.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to acquire property benefits equivalent to the security value equivalent to the maximum amount of 480 million won in order to secure the above loan principle and caused property damage equivalent to the same amount to the victims.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ legal statement
1. Defendant ..