logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.06.01 2015고단6755
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, from February 2, 2015 to February 17, 2015, was a person employed by the construction company called the “C” to work as a technical field assistant from the construction company, and the victim D, operating the “E”, supplied human resources at the site of construction works conducted by the said C.

In fact, the Defendant did not have received delegation from the F father of C, there is no reason to make advance payment of personnel expenses of the members who will be sent to the KONEX in C, and there was no intention or ability to make advance payment until the payment was made.

Nevertheless, on February 12, 2015, the Defendant is the F director working in B, who called the above D at the seat of the border.

C If the removal of the body is required to work on the KONEX, it is necessary to additionally dispatch the human body.

Since human resources are professional human resources, we must move to Seoul and pay daily wages to those parts who have so started to do so. In our company, it is difficult for our company to pay monthly personnel expenses and pay daily wages to them.

It is expected to pay personnel expenses to the executive officers who work in the KONEX site in advance in the following month.

“Along on February 13, 2015, the member received KRW 2,025,00 from the injured party in cash and acquired KRW 17,662,50 in total on 10 occasions from March 10, 2015 through the same method, including the receipt of KRW 2,025,00 from the injured party in cash, from March 10, 2015.

"2016 Highest 704"

1. The Defendant is a person who had worked as a daily clerical assistant in the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. from February 3, 2015 to February 17, 2015, and F is the head of the technical department of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd.

The Defendant forged F’s work log for workers in the name of F, and followed D, an operator of “E”, who supplies human resources to the said company, is driving as if he/she was F, and is working on the said work log.

arrow