beta
Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. On January 31, 2016, the Defendant entered the building behind the building through a parking lot outside the front door of the building, and opened the back door of E main shop operated by the victim D on the first floor of the building and intrudes into the main room, and KRW 1 million in cash owned by the victim and KRW 1 million in cash owned by the victim within the small credit cooperative located in the main room of the above main office, respectively.
They go back.
Accordingly, the defendant stolen another's property by destroying door at night and impairing a structure.
2. There is no direct evidence that corresponds to the above facts charged.
However, the following circumstances can be inferred that the Defendant committed the instant crime.
According to the CCTV screen taken around the site of this case, the defendant entered the front of the E main building on January 31, 2016, and moved to the rear of the main building on January 31, 2016, around 05:24, and around January 31, 2016, the building was going to the front of the above main building, and the building was going to the front of the building on around 05:26, around 05:27, and 05:31, the building was going to the front of the building. The building was going to the front of the building on around 05:36, and the building was going to the front of the building on around 05:37.
According to the victim D's statement, around 02:30 on January 31, 2016, the victim retired from E's main office around E around 02:30, but was working at around 08:30 on around 00, and the theft case occurred during that period.
According to the records, on April 3, 2015, the Defendant was convicted of 10 months of imprisonment with prison labor for habitual larceny, and 2 years of suspended sentence at the time of the above crime. The method of crime is similar to this case (the case of theft of a small credit cooperative in beauty room with a glass window). As a result of the investigation of nearby CCTV around the site of the case, the police, knowing that the Defendant was at the site of the case at the time of the crime, was aware that the Defendant was at the time of the crime, and identified the Defendant as the suspect, and the Defendant was investigated on February 16, 2016.