beta
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit
Seoul High Court-2016-Nu-70842 (2017.05.10)
Title
(D) The attachment disposition is legitimate because it cannot be viewed as a serious and obvious defect even if the Plaintiff was not an actual business operator of the workplace of this case.
Summary
(Main) The Plaintiff asserts that the Defendant’s seizure disposition of real estate owned by the Plaintiff is invalid as a matter of course, but it is difficult to regard the assertion as an obvious defect in itself.
Cases
2017Du50195 Nullification of a disposition of seizure of real estate
Plaintiff-Appellant
AA
Defendant-Appellee
a) the Director of the Tax Office
Judgment of the lower court
Seoul High Court Decision 2016Nu70842 Decided May 11, 2017
Imposition of Judgment
October 12, 2017
Text
The appeal is dismissed.
The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.
Reasons
Examining the lower judgment and the grounds of appeal, the grounds of appeal by appellant are not included in the grounds of appeal under each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, or are deemed to fall under each subparagraph of paragraph (3). Therefore, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per