The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The Defendant is the captain of the vessel owner interest of D (9.77 tons, FRP lines, diesel 355 EM) located in C at the time of military acid.

No one shall keep or use harmful chemicals pursuant to Article 2 subparag. 7 of the Chemicals Control Act for the purpose of cultivating fishery resources or removing foreign substances attached to fishing gear or fishing net. On February 6, 2015, at around 06:30, the defendant loaded and stored in the above D 20 liters of inorganic acid in E located in Gunsan City C on February 6, 2015.

2. According to the evidence submitted by the judgment prosecutor, it is recognized that the defendant loaded 500 liters of inorganic acid (inorganic acid) around February 6, 2015, around D around February 6, 2015.

Although the Defendant did not directly use at an investigative agency, he/she loaded in D inorganic acids to transport it to another Kim Farming market.

However, “the purpose of having another person use them for the cultivation of fishery resources or for the removal of foreign substances attached to fishing gear or fishing nets” under Article 25(2) of the Fishery Resources Management Act was the Defendant’s “the purpose of removing foreign substances attached to fishery resources cultivating fishery resources or fishing gear or fishing nets”

shall not be deemed to exist.

Ultimately, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone was “for the purpose of removing foreign substances attached to the fishery resources aquaculture or fishing gear or fishing net”

The recognition is insufficient, and there is no other evidence to prove it.

3. In conclusion, since the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of crime, a judgment of innocence is rendered after the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the purport of public announcement of judgment of innocence is not pronounced pursuant to the proviso of Article 58(2) of the Criminal Act.