1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Evidence 【Evidence” 【A-1-1, 2, A-2, A-3, A10-1 through 7, B-2, B-3, B-1, B-2, witness C, C-D, and the purport of the whole pleadings;

A. The Plaintiff purchased a building listed in the [Attachment List (hereinafter “instant building”) from the Si of New Dos around May 9, 2001 with the consideration of the Plaintiff as the Korea Buddhist E, and created “F” after completing the registration of ownership transfer in its name on May 10, 2001, and completed Epolog and research activities in the instant building.

B. Around 2010, the Plaintiff was seeking a third party to appoint a person to be aware of the fact that he/she reached 80 years of age and became F.

On the other hand, the defendant introduced the plaintiff through the introduction of H chief of H in Busan as the U.S. M. M. K. M. M. M. in Busan as the U. M. M. M. M., and introduced the plaintiff as the president of K. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. to develop F into E’s intent and J research center. The plaintiff followed an example that the plaintiff is the defendant around April 201.

C. After that, on April 26, 2011, the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of the Defendant under the Seoul Central District Court’s registration No. 21160 received on April 26, 2011.

2. The parties’ assertion and the decision of this court [Plaintiff’s assertion] asserted that the Plaintiff established the Defendant and F as a religious corporation on March 4, 201, and donated the instant building to a new corporation and agreed to complete the registration of ownership transfer in the name of the corporation, and did not have concluded a sales contract on the instant building with the Defendant, and did not receive KRW 110 million in the purchase price, and thus, the registration of ownership transfer in the name of the Defendant on the instant building is invalid for lack of a sales contract.

[Dissenting the Defendant’s assertion] The Defendant asserts that around April 201, the Plaintiff and the instant building were simplified, and that the Plaintiff was donated to the Defendant for the management of F, who is difficult to manage F because of its old age.

[Judgment] (1) Evidence A4, A5-1 to 7, A6.