logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2015.06.16 2014고단3162
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 11, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. at the Busan District Court on April 4, 201 and completed the execution of the said punishment on June 4, 2014.

The Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 50,000 on July 24, 2012 to a fine of KRW 500,000 for attempted larceny at the Busan District Court; on May 16, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months for larceny; on May 31, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 1,000,000 for larceny from the Suwon District Court’s Housing Site on May 31, 2013 to a fine of KRW 1,00,000 for larceny; on August 14, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 2,00,000 for larceny at the Suwon District Court on September 16, 2013 to a fine of KRW 1,00,000 for larceny, etc. at the Incheon District Court on September 16, 2013 to a punishment of imprisonment with prison labor from Busan District Court on April 11, 2014, etc.

On September 4, 2014, around 10:20 on September 10, 2014, the Defendant: (a) deemed that the victim E was divingd at a soup room of “D” located in Busan Jin-gu, Busan; (b) held one gallon 3 mobile phones with the market price of KRW 1,000,000, and stolen it; and (c) from around September 4, 2014 to December 6, 2014, “galgno No. 2” out of the thefts listed in attached Table No. 15 of the daily list of crimes listed in attached Table 15 appears to be a clerical error in “galgno No. 3”.

The total amount of 9,551,600 won was stolen through 16 times in total.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually stolen the property owned by the victims.

around October 18, 2014, the Defendant “2015 Man-Ma389” sentenced LG G3 mobile phones possessed by the victim G in Ansan-si, Seoul-si, to sell cash to the victim as if he/she was his/her own possession, while making a false statement that “I would sell cash-oriented mobile phones to the victim.”

However, the above mobile phone is the object of H which the defendant stolen, and the defendant disposes of the above mobile phone.

arrow