Defendant C shall pay 124,750,000 won to the Plaintiff and 12% per annum from December 10, 2019 to the day of full payment.

1. Chief;

A. The plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff's assertion is sought

1. The plaintiff's claim is the friendship of the defendant C, and the defendant B is the legal spouse of the defendant C.

Defendant C purchased heavy equipment construction machinery, etc. and sold or leased it to a third party. However, Defendant C borrowed money from time to time to time to the Plaintiff whenever it is necessary to make it difficult to maintain the financial status while carrying out the project.

As it is impossible to refuse the request by the defendant C, the plaintiff lent money to the defendant C.

The Plaintiff borrowed KRW 5,00,000 from July 8, 2010 to Defendant C through the Agricultural Cooperative account as follows: (a) from July 11, 2019, the Plaintiff lent KRW 124,750,000 to July 11, 2019.

In relation to the above borrowed money, the Plaintiff demanded the Defendant C to pay the debt during that period, but at all times, it was not a harsh demand to the same student.

Financial transaction details on July 8, 201, August 4, 2011: (a) on October 23, 2013, 2013; (b) on October 10, 2018, 5,000,000; (c) on October 31, 2018, 200,000; (d) on 5,000,000; (d) on 1,000,000; (e) on 10,00,000,000; (e) on 1, 200,000,000; (v) on 1, 2019; (v) on May 3, 2019; (v) on 1, 200,000; and (v) on 1, 200,000; (v) on May 1, 2014, 2019;

2. As to the fraudulent act, the recent defendant C told the plaintiff that he is preparing for divorce with the defendant C, and the defendant B demanded the transfer of the property to the defendant C according to divorce.

At present, if the property owned by Defendant C is given to Defendant B with the only property indicated in the attached list, I would like to ask how the money will be settled until now, and the defendant C would be paid in full, regardless of how the divorce is settled.

As such, Defendant C is its sole property.