(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2013.04.25 2013고정115

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2013.04.25 2013고정115

상해

Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 1:50 on September 16, 2012, the Defendant d (the age of 49) and d (the age of d) of the victim d (the age of 49) who driven a car in front of the Manan-gu, Manan-gu, Suyang-si, the Defendant d (the age of d) and d) brought a bath for the victim as he was fluord, and d) committed an assault, such as spiting the victim's face, spiting the flap and booming the flap with his hand, and booming the victim's face, and flading it into the victim's face, and flading it into the bottom by cutting the flab and selling it into the bottom, thereby doing so for approximately three weeks of treatment.

Although the prosecutor indicted the Defendant for the crime of assaulting the victim with the intention to inflict the bodily injury, there is no evidence to acknowledge the intentional part of the bodily injury, and thus, not guilty pursuant to the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act. However, as long as the prosecutor found the Defendant guilty of the bodily injury due to the crime of assaulting the victim with the intent to inflict the bodily injury, it shall not be sentenced differently in the text

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The prosecutor's protocol of interrogation of the accused (including D's statement)

1. Examination protocol of police suspect regarding D;

1. A criminal investigation report (general);

1. The Defendant asserts to the effect that the Defendant’s assertion of each photograph and injury diagnosis constitutes self-defense, even if it is acknowledged that the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim even if he/she had done so, since it was during the process of defending one another.

In full view of each evidence of the judgment, the fact that the defendant continued to catch and retail the victim's arms while fighting with the victim, and that the defendant and the victim were flicked with each other, and the defendant can recognize the fact that the victim was flicker's body while flicking the body in the ground, and the victim was flicker's body.

참조조문

-형사소송법 제325조

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 2013.09.25 2013노2210

-대전지방법원 공주지원 2013.07.26 2013고정44

-서울중앙지방법원 2011.08.24 2011고정3984

-수원지방법원 안양지원 2013.02.13 2012고단1408

-서울서부지방법원 2018.04.24 2017고정1250