logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.06.20 2017나49553
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, except where the tenth or less of the judgment of the court of the first instance (10th or less of the judgment of the court of the first instance) is used. Thus, this part is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

D. The plaintiff's assertion 1) The plaintiff is obligated to compensate the plaintiff for damages caused by negligence although the defendant B, who is the seller, had a duty to provide accurate information on the sectioned building of this case, and caused the plaintiff to be negligent. ② The defendant C is obligated to confirm the status of the object of brokerage in accordance with Articles 25 (1) 3 and 21 (1) 5 of the Licensed Real Estate Agent Act and Article 25 (1) of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act, and explain the status of the object of brokerage to the brokerage client faithfully and correctly, and take measures such as investigating and demanding materials with the care of a good manager. However, the plaintiff is liable to compensate the plaintiff for damages caused by negligence by wrong delivery of information on the object of brokerage. ③ On the other hand, in relation to the scope of compensation for damages, the amount equivalent to the cost of installing urban gas in the sectioned building of this case and all damages arising therefrom are difficult to determine the extent of the plaintiff's property damages, and the other party's obligation to notify mental damages due to the defendants' unlawful acts or to money.

arrow