A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

15 million won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates the building B and the "C Gameland" on the second floor in South Yangyang-si, and D is an employee of the above game site.

No one shall engage in the business of exchanging or arranging the exchange or repurchase of tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game products.

Nevertheless, from December 7, 2017 to February 23, 2018, the Defendant, along with D, offered an ICT chip form card to the unspecified number of customers who found it in the above game site, had them display the card on a game machine, and let them play the game by using cash, and then, if the customers obtain points such as 'self-repair', 1, 2, 4, 10, 10, 200, 5,000 won per point, after confirming the card.

As a result, the defendant conspired with D to exchange premiums, which are results obtained through the use of game products, as a business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A written statement of F and D;

1. On-site and photographs of seized games;

1. A criminal investigation report (a statement, etc. of an informant);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Articles 44 (1) 2 and 32 (1) 7 of the Act on the Selection of Game Industry, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 44(2) of the Act on the Promotion of Additional Collection and Game Industry [the scope of recommendations according to the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court] The basic field (6-1 year and 6 months) of the second category (6-1 year and 6 months) such as the provision of illegal game products to a group of speculative and game products crimes, etc. [the decision of sentence] has committed the same type of crime again despite the fact that the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment due to the operation of an illegal game room.

The above circumstances are as follows.