Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.

However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A operated a salt farm in the name of "F" in the Jeonnam-gun E, N, and Defendant B succeeded to and operated the above F from the mother of the defendant since 2010.

1. Defendant A

A. A. Around April 2005, the Defendant: (a) was introduced from the insular and aesthetic influent female business proprietor located in a wooden field to the victim G with low level of gambling capacity; (b) concluded that “the victim was placed under the Defendant’s real control, with the intention of having the victim satise and work in the Defendant’s satise, with the aim of having the victim satise and work in the Defendant’s satise; and (c) the victim was placed under the Defendant’s active control from that time to May 13, 2014.”

B. A quasi-Fraud Defendant, around April 2005, made a false statement to the victim G, who was in the Republic of Korea, at the Defendant’s home of the Haan-gun, Jeonnam-gun, Haan-gun, stating, “I will give one million won per month in our house.”

However, in fact, the Defendant was aware of the fact that the victim was unable to exercise his right to claim wages normally because the victim was incapable of exercising his right to claim wages due to the lack of his/her ability to distinguish wages from others.

Nevertheless, the Defendant had the victim do work in the Defendant’s salt farm and did not pay wages, from that time, and did not pay a total of KRW 44,286,960 as shown in the attached Table of Crimes (1) until December 31, 2009, thereby acquiring pecuniary benefits equivalent to the above amount.

2. The suspect B;

A. A quasi-Fraud Defendant succeeded to F operated by the Defendant’s mother A on January 2010, and made a false statement to the victim G, stating that “I will give KRW 1 million per month.”

However, in fact, the Defendant was aware of the fact that the victim was unable to exercise his right to claim wages normally because the victim was incapable of exercising his/her right to claim wages due to the lack of his/her ability to distinguish wages.