logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.06.20 2013고합30
배임수재등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for a year.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendants B and A’s breach of trust is the N’s largest child, the president of LM High School located in K in light of light, who is in charge of the occupational department of the above school. Defendant B performed the practical role of the president who is responsible for the overall operation of the school, such as the employment of regular teachers on behalf of the president N, who is the senior mother of the school. The director, who is his wife, was in charge of the above school administrative affairs, such as the employment of regular teachers.

Defendant

A은 서울 강남구 P 1603호에 있는 ㈜Q연구소(이하 ‘연구소’라고 한다)의 대표이사로 R이라는 인터넷사이트(S)를 개설하여 운영하여 왔다.

Defendant

B In dealing with the affairs of employing regular teachers together with theO, a person who has passed an open screening process, such as a written examination, practical examination, and interview, shall be appointed as regular teachers in a fair and transparent manner in accordance with the Private School Act and the LIB's articles of incorporation and shall not receive money and valuables in return for the employment of regular teachers.

Nevertheless, Defendant B, along withO on January 208, 2008, proposed that “I (Defendant A) would recommend regular teachers from among the members of the research institute in Korea at once to employ regular teachers at our school,” and offered that “I would like to recruit regular teachers from among the members of the research institute in question if I would be employed as regular teachers, I would like to accept a reward for the employment of regular teachers from the research institute with Defendant A and the research institute members, by taking advantage of the position with the authority to employ regular teachers.”

Accordingly, the defendant A, within the research institute office operated by himself on February 2, 2008 according to the above public invitation, was delivered 10,000 won in cash with 10,000 won in cash as 10,000 won in the attached list of crimes, along with the illegal solicitation that the defendant A, within the research institute office operated by himself on February 2, 2008, from U who is a member of the research institute, as a regular teacher of the electronic computer communication subject of the above school.

arrow