logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2014.05.15 2012고단1862
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. From January 2005 to July 1 of the same year, the Defendant provided that “the Defendant would repay money to the victim not later than January 15, 2006, by offering the money as security, etc. the deposit amount of KRW 15 million for the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the Busan-gu Busan-gu C at the victim’s house located in Busan-gu, Busan-gu, Busan-do, by providing the Defendant with the deposit of KRW 15 million for the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the purchase of the purchase of the purchase of the purchase of the purchase of the purchase of the purchase

However, the Defendant did not have any specific property, and the above deposit for the lease on a deposit basis did not have been actually returned due to the repayment of the loan and the monthly rent to the lessor, and the parking lot business operated with the husband E was operated with the husband E, and there was no ability to repay the loan by the agreed date.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, was given KRW 30 million in total under the pretext of borrowing from the victim.

2. Around July 15, 2005, the Defendant’s house located in the Defendant’s house located in Busan-gu, Busan-do, is insufficient to pay money to the Victim G to expand the parking lot E by her husband.

When a person lends money, he/she is expected to offer the said defendant's house as security and repay the money, which is one million won from the trusted victim, and he/she was paid two million won from his/her seat. On November 29, 2005 of the same year, he/she was paid five million won from the trusted victim with credit cards and loans to a prison due to the receipt of credit cards and the repayment.

However, the Defendant did not have any specific property, and the above deposit for the lease on a deposit basis did not have been actually returned due to the repayment of the loan and the monthly rent for the lessor, and the parking lot business operated with the husband E was operated with the husband E, and there was no ability to repay the loan in arrears every month.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and is in the name of the borrowed money from the victim.

arrow