logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원고양지원 2020.09.10 2020고단1729
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(성적목적다중이용장소침입)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 4.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On 25, 2020, around 04:28, the Defendant intruded into the public use area, such as a toilet, etc., used by many and unspecified persons, in order to cut away the figures of women who are viewed as being melted in front of the first floor female toilets of the building in Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Busan, B, and on 04:29 on the same day, the Defendant intruded into the third floor female toilets of the same building by the same method as the third floor female toilets of the same building on 04:35 on the same day and to satisfy their sexual desire.

2. At around 05:10 on the same day as Paragraph 1, the Defendant: (a) entered the front of the female toilets of the first floor of the building C in Yongsan-gu, Manyang-si; (b) went into the front of the female toilets of the first floor; and (c) went into the front of the first floor of the building C; and (d) went into the public use place used by many and unspecified persons, such as toilets, for the purpose of meeting their own sexual desire, such as stealinging the victim D (name, n, b, 29 years old) who was melting in the

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report of police statements to D (B building Cctv video-recordings) and internal investigation reports (ctv video-recordings at the site of the incident);

1. Relevant legal provisions on criminal facts and Article 12 of the former Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (amended by Act No. 17264 of May 19, 2020), each of the choice of fines [it appears to be a contingent crime in light of the criminal history and the situation of the defendant, etc., although the contents of the crime are considerably poor, it appears to be a contingent crime in light of the criminal situation and the situation at the time of the defendant, and the defendant has no criminal power so far, the defendant is able to guide the defendant as his student status, and the mother is leading to the guidance of the defendant; the upper limit of the fine in this case is 4.5 million won, not a five million won, among the former concurrent crimes by the prosecution (amended by Act No. 17264 of May

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Order to complete a program;

arrow