beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for eight months.
However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant A.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
B is a person who served as the head of the D Village in the Development-gun from around December 2012 to December 2017, and the defendant A is a resident of the above D Village.
In January 2017, the Defendants submitted the “F Village Development Project” promotion plan to the victim development head at the above E office, and did not actually form the relevant promotion committee, and even if the Defendants were planned to grow the portrait personally, they were willing to form the D Village Promotion Committee and to submit the false project plan, etc. to the victim development head and receive local subsidies, as they participated in the project.
1. The act of forging a private document and uttering of a falsified investigation document by Defendant B
A. On January 2017, the Defendant forged a private document: (a) at the E office located in the G branch in the G branch in the G branch in the G branch in the Chungcheongnam-gun, the Defendant submitted the name of the participating residents and the relevant branch, etc. to the public official in charge in order to pretend that D community residents wish to undertake the project; and (b) submitted it to the said public official in charge to confirm the “H” and sexual name column in the main column of the “I” and “I” in the contact column; and (c) written “K, L, M, N, P, Q, Q, T, T, U” in the contact column, and written “W” and “W” in the “W,” and written in the column of the said written confirmation or letter “B,” and had the signature or seal of the said public official in advance.
The 13 community residents' names, contact numbers, and subjects are stated in the above confirmation in the same way over a total of 13 times, such as the one affixed with I's seal on the same day, and the seal of the village residents in the prior custody was affixed.
Accordingly, the defendant forged the letter of confirmation, which is a private document on fact certification for the purpose of exercising the right.
B. The Defendant, at the same time and place as Paragraph 1-A, did not know of the forgery as Paragraph 1-A, and the E office that did not know of the forgery.