(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.02.19 2013고정1626

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.02.19 2013고정1626

협박등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant married with his children on January 3, 2013, but there is a dispute over the division of property between the victim C (the 34 years of age) who was divorced by agreement with his children on January 3, 2013, the defendant tried to find the place of work of the victim due to the transfer of apartment registered under the joint name of the victim with his children.

At around 14:40 on June 17, 2013, the Defendant: (a) sought the E-middle school school office for the victim working in Seo-gu, Daejeon, Daejeon; and (b) threatened the victim with the fact that the victim was divorced as a counseling room for the victim and the female teacher, saying, “The victim talks with multiple births, talks to talk with him, and talks with him only as he was promised to do so; and (c) “At the time of first divorce, it has been promised to do so,” and “at the time of first divorce, it is not necessary to do so, and there is no need to do so, and thus, the victim threatened him.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing recording records;

1. Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the order of provisional payment;

1. On June 20, 2013, around 14:40, the Defendant injured the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out facts by openly pointing out the fact that “the father of the former husband who was divorced in Korea C” was aware of the victim’s divorce in the E-middle School principal office where the victim works for the victim in Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, i.e., the Defendant agreed on the issue of division of property, etc. of the victim.

참조조문

유사 판례

-대전지방법원 2014.08.27 2014노765

-서울동부지방법원 2019.05.16 2019고단2 (1)

-부산지방법원 동부지원 2017.12.13 2017고정788

-대구지방법원 2020.11.18 2020고정1434

-대전지방법원 2020.05.07 2020고단127