A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 14, 1992, the Defendant was appointed as a master inspector for local forestry in the Gun, and thereafter, from January 1, 2016 to the present date, the Defendant is in charge of the completion inspection, etc. of the “D Development Project” (hereinafter referred to as “D Development Project”) ordered by B in the Gun while serving as B military tourism and C fraternity (Grade VI and local green belt injection). On the other hand, the Defendant is a master supervisor of the Gun directly under the direct control of E, who is in charge of the overall management of the instant construction.

G operating F was a person retired from office as a public official belonging to B from around 1974 to June 2013; from around 2008 to around 2010, at the time of serving as a head of B H (class V and Grade V) of B military division, there was personal relationship with the Defendant, such as working together with the Defendant who is the competent officer of B-I affiliated with the same division (Class VII).

G A around January 16, 2017, at the request of the Defendant for the supply of pine trees owned by him/her to the instant Corporation on or before January 16, 2017, upon requesting that the Defendant deliver pine trees owned by him/her.

1. Sheet water and approximately 9M, R 70cc, price of 35 million won (excluding VAT);

2. Around 09:42 on the same day, the Defendant sent a text message containing approximately 5.5m, approximately 50m, and approximately 50m, price 35,000,000 won (VAT separate), and the Defendant sent the above text message to J, who is an employee of the instant design firm.

After that day, the Defendant sent to G a written estimate stating the size and price of trees, such as the content of the foregoing text message.

G requested to change and submit a quotation in the name of L (state) to K, who is a landscaping business operator, by e-mail, and the defendant sent the above e-mail to J as it is, so that the size and price trees desired by G were reflected in the construction design of this case.

On March 2017, the Defendant continued to call the instant construction to N representative of M(State) who was awarded the contract, and “The number of pine trees to be supplied to the Corporation has already been determined.”