Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff) who is equivalent to the amount of the order to pay the following amounts.

(c)shall be prepared;

(d)

On November 30, 2018, the Defendant entered into a contract with the Plaintiff to produce and supply H under the above supply contract (hereinafter “instant contract”) with the Plaintiff for the performance of the above supply contract in KRW 43,80,000,000, and prepared a contract including the following (Provided, That the portion of “(before delivery)” is written as the terms of payment). The Defendant paid KRW 21,90,000 to the Plaintiff according to the instant contract.

The Office ordering Order Office of the Republic of Korea: The name of the other party to the contract of the Republic of Korea (the representative of the defendant): H purchase contract amount: 43,800,000 won (including VT): The rate of delayed reward: 0.075% from November 30, 2018 to December 30, 2018: the payment terms: 50% (including 21,90,000 won, and VAT) at the time of the contract and 50% (including 21,90,000 won, and VAT) at the time of delivery (including 21,90,000 won, and 50% from the remainder at the time of delivery (including delivery). Other matters: this contract correspond to the contract and specification with the procuring entity.

* Separate: A letter of demand by a procuring entity

E. On December 18, 2018, the Plaintiff’s employees asserted that, among the goods required by the Defendant’s husband G, the Plaintiff’s her husband G sent the Defendant’s letter of request for the alteration of the specifications to be submitted to the Defendant, the Defendant sent e-mail a letter of request for the alteration of the specifications to the Defendant, e-mail, arguing that: (a) the letter of request for the alteration of the specifications to be submitted to the Defendant in charge of the Air Force, e-mail, e-mail, i.e., “it is possible to adjust the location and height of ice 4 stocks for an entertainment business; and (b) the letter of request for the alteration of the specifications of the Air Force, i.e., “for the use of wheel measurement due to the application of the post-wheeled Sick board.”

F. On December 20, 2018, G made a call to K at the time of delivery by an inspector of the Air Force.

“The message sent the text message,” and on December 21, 2018, sent the text message requesting the delivery deadline.

G shall consult, on December 24, 2018, K with respect to the alteration of specifications.