1. The appeal filed by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) against the principal lawsuit is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are borne by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff).

1. In the first instance court within the scope of judgment in this court, the plaintiff filed a claim for the return of deposit for lease with the principal lawsuit, ② the registration of the right to lease for housing and the costs of lawsuit, ③ the claim for damages due to extension of the loan for lease for a deposit, and the defendant filed a claim for the cancellation of the

The first instance court accepted part of the plaintiff's damages for delay and part of the plaintiff's damages for delay, and dismissed the others, 1, 3, and 2, the plaintiff's claim and the counterclaim of the defendant, respectively.

Therefore, the defendant only filed an appeal against the defendant as to the main lawsuit among the judgment of the court of first instance, which is limited to the part partially quoted in the plaintiff's claim of main lawsuit.

2. The court's explanation of this case is identical to the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, the court's explanation of this case is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal against the principal lawsuit is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.